Daniel's Fishin Site



Home

The Boat
Rod & Reel
Baits to use
Equipment
The fish we catch
Fishing Rule's & Regulations
Knots
PowerPro knots
Tide Chart
Cool Stuff
Message Board's
Shark's!
Gallery
Fishing Report
New Fishing Equipment
Fishing Store
Fishing Store Pt. 2
Radar.
Knots To M.P.H
Boating Laws
Water Temperature Image
The Map
Shark's!

 

Sometimes called the white death, the Man-eater, the White Pointer (in Australia) or the Blue Pointer (in South Africa), the shark is found, now in decreasing numbers, in all tropical, subtropical and temperate seas. It is most often recorded in relatively shallow offshore waters. It may well occur in deeper waters but has not been noticed there. It appears to prefer subtropical waters to temperate waters. The Great White shark has been recorded within the Mediterranean Sea, and there are reliable records of it's occurrence around the coasts of Britain up to about the middle of the last century, especially around the Cornish peninsula and in the Bristol Channel. Whether as a result of climatic changes, pollution or a lack of food, none has been seen last century or this in British coastal waters.
 
Despite the common names the Great White shark is not white. A large specimen is slaty grey, dun, blue or very dark grey on the back and top of the sides. This darker colour changes abruptly to a cream or dirty white to pale grey on the lower part of the sides and belly.
 
Although the Great White is the largest of carnivorous sharks, it does not reach the size alleged in popular literature and in the films. The largest accurately measured specimen, caught of Cuba in 1945, was 6.4m (21ft) long and weighed just over 3 tons. Of moderate reliability is an unsubstantiated report of a specimen 9m (29ft) long caught off the Azores in 1978. in a slightly less reliable category still is the report of an 11.3m (37ft) long fish from New Brunswick, Canada, in the 1930's. Perhaps more interesting is that small specimens are practically unknown.
Very little is known about the biology of the Great White shark. It is not evenly distributed throughout it's range, nor necessarily throughout the year at any one locality. There is some evidence that this species may show some territoriality, returning to the same coastal area year after year. The age of the mother at sexual maturity is unknown, as is the life expectancy of the species although ages of 10 years and 40-50 years have been suggested. Neither the mating or pupping areas are unknown. The relative frequency of small specimens in one part of the western North Atlantic has led to postulations that the waters off Montauk Point, Long Island may be a pupping region. If, as is like that of other lamnid sharks, it will give birth to a few, well formed young, possibly only every alternate year. Like all other sharks, the Great White has an electroreceptive sense. It is thought that some attacks on small boats (right) are the result of the sharks being attracted by the electric field set up between the metal of the boat and the sea water and so mistaking the boat for a prey item.

Like all other large predators, the Great White has an efficient sensory system to help it locate it's prey. It can detect blood and the scent of other body fluids from a distance of about 1km (.6 mile). It can follow the scent trail upstream accurately and then use it's other senses as it gets within 150m (165 yards) to pinpoint it's prey. It's sensory pits and lateral line easily pick up the disturbances made by movements in the water, and it is particularly sensitive to unnatural sounds and movements, such as those made by an injured animal or struggling fish.

Sharks use their eyes when they are within about 25m (27yards) of prey, even in poor light conditions. In this way, they can accurately use their jaws to make the final capture. A further set of sensory structures - which can detect the minute electrical currents generated by the nervous system of other living things - takes over when the shark is only a short distance away. The more the prey struggles and thrashes around in the water, the greater the electrical stimulation detected by the shark.

SHARKS DO ATTACK HUMANS!
They also attack, and eat, seals, sea-lions, birds, turtles, fish, crustaceans, shellfish and plankton. Circumstantial evidence - eg teeth marks and stomach contents - shows that they could be accused of attacking, and eating, under sea cables, sea anchors, small boats, oil drums, sea weed, planks of wood, old tyres, beer cans...and other sharks.

YES, sharks do attack humans - but it is important to put such relatively rare events in perspective and to realise that sharks do not single out the human species as the object of a vicious predetermined vendetta. The interaction between sharks and humans is the same as that between sharks and any other floating or swimming object that attracts their attention. But human self-centredness rarely appreciates this. If a shark bites and eats a seal, that is fine (except for the seal). If a shark eats another shark that is even better. But if a shark bites a human, the shark is promptly branded as a savage killer deliberately attempting to slaughter peaceful bathers and surfers who are just enjoying themselves in the sea. It is also quite acceptable for us to eat shark meat, but not for the shark to eat human flesh.

Although the phrase 'shark attack' is commonly employed to describe shark-human interaction, the use of the word 'attack' could in reality be misleading because of it's overtly antagonistic implications. 'Enemy'' is usually linked with 'attack', one does not, however, attack enemies with the intention of eating them. Thus it is with sharks: their 'motive' is food, not an all out assault on Homo sapiens. Despite this, the phrase 'shark attack' remains in frequent use.

Shark attacks are rare, and only some 30% of the people bitten die. Death is mostly due to loss of blood and shock, which can result in the victims drowning before rescue. Instances of a shark eating any substantial portion of a human prey are very few. It seems that sharks actually do not like human flesh. Most bites, as might be expected, are on the lower part of the legs, from the knee downwards, thighs are the next most vulnerable part of the body, followed by the arms, middle of the trunk, chest, back, shoulders. Least attacked of all is the head. In other words, most attacks are directed to the rear part of the swimmer. The hands and arms seem mostly to be bitten when the victim tries to fend off the shark. The most frequent wounds are deep lacerations, as if the taste of the preliminary bite is enough to tell the shark it has chosen the wrong sort of food. It is rare for much human flesh or appendages to be swallowed, and even rarer for a large part, or the whole, of a corpse to be ingested.

Most cases of shark attack are a result of mistaken identity. Attacks are increasingly being targeted on surfers, whose silhouettes resemble those of the pinnipeds (seals, sea lion etc.) on which the Great White feeds. A shark is also attracted to the splashing in the water we all make whilst swimming.

Often the shark will take an investigative bite, or circle slowly maybe bumping the victim. But mostly once the shark has bitten it will let go as it has discovered that it doesn't like the taste of human flesh or fibreglass as pictured right.

Statistics can be used spuriously to prove almost anything, and this is especially true for statistics on shark attacks. Apart from the fact that more people are struck by lightning, stung by insects and killed by snakes than are bitten by sharks each year, drowning near a bathing beach is more than a 1000 times more likely than being killed by a shark around the coasts of the USA.

Most shark attacks occur in warm waters at temperatures of about 70ºF (21ºC). Some authorities believe this is to be because the sharks are commoner, and more active at these temperatures. Other authorities argue that it is because there are more people in the sea in warmer climates. Both, of course, make sense. Throughout the world, shark incidents are relatively numerous off east and south east Australia and the Pacific islands; the South African coast; the Caribbean and both seaboards of the USA; the Persian Gulf; and with decreasing frequency, south and east Asia, the Mediterranean and South America. The distribution of shark attacks must, though be interpreted with great care. For example, there are very many more reports from the eastern coast of South Africa than from the western coast. This is probably because the western coast is lapped by the cold Benguela current, so fewer people are in the sea. Off the west coast of the USA most attacks are close to large centres of population because (a) there are more swimmers, and (b) the attacks are more likely to be reported. Very few attacks have been recorded from South America, probably because attacks in isolated areas are not reported or because reports in non-European languages are less accessible. Overall, the reported locations of shark attack show little more than where there are concentrations of European-language speakers in the sea and not where there is an abundance of particularly inquisitive sharks.

The timing of shark attacks throughout the year varies from place to place and leads to what are again obvious conclusions. For instance, around New Zealand no attacks have been reported between April and November. That span of months represents New Zealand winter and few people go swimming in the cold seas. Similarly on the east coast of the USA about 80% of shark attacks occur during the five warmest months (May to September) of the year. On a smaller scale, there are more attacks at weekends than on weekdays. During the day, there is a late morning peak, a trough in attacks at lunchtime, and another peak between 2-4pm. Surveys of the human population show that these times are again when most bathers are in the water.

Nearly two thirds of attack happen in water less than 1.5m (5ft) deep, while only 1% take place in water more than 45m (150ft) deep. Also one third of attacks occur less than 15m (50) from the shore and just 3% from 45-60m (150-200ft) out. All that these statistics reflect is the abundance of people. More people are in shallow water near the shore than in deep offshore water.

If a person is determined to swim in tropical waters, what can be done to minimise the risk of shark attack? In general, the best 'protection' for a swimmer is to find out where the sharks are densest and avoid that area. For example, sharks often congregate around sewage outfalls or where offal is regularly discharged into the water. Avoid areas where people are fishing - the bait may have already attracted sharks. Swim in groups, the larger the number of people in a group, the less chance of any individual being attacked. Keep clear of areas where the depth changes rapidly - i.e. near a deep channel. Keep an eye open for any signs of unusual behaviour in the fishes of the area. It is advisable not to swim with seals or sea lions. Avoid wearing bright or reflective garments or decorations that could arouse the sharks curiosity. Do not become paranoid about being bitten by a shark: the risk is infinitesimally small. Remember: sharks do not really like the taste of human flesh. For the really paranoid the only safe way to avoid becoming a shark's snack is to stay on the beach. There are no recorded attacks on dry land.

Copyright © 2002-2003 SaltwaterFisherman